Editorial Type: INVERTEBRATE-PARASITE RELATIONSHIPS
 | 
Online Publication Date: 01 Feb 2011

Insight into the Short-Finned Squid Illex coindetii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) Feeding Ecology: Is There a Link Between Helminth Parasites and Food Composition?

Full access
,
, and
Article Category: Research Article
Page Range: 55 – 62
DOI: 10.1645/GE-2562.1
Save
Download PDF

Abstract

Squids are especially frequent as paratenic hosts of helminth parasites, particularly to those that have elasmobranchs and mammals as final hosts. Among those parasite species, anisakid nematode larvae and cestode plerocercoids are most effectively transferred through the trophic chain by oegopsid squids. A total of 439 short-finned squids, Illex coindetii (245 males, 190 females and 4 unsexed) were sampled in the central part of the eastern Adriatic Sea in order to assess their helminth component community and parasite dynamics with respect to host sex, maturity, seasonality, and feeding behavior. Two larval helminths were isolated, i.e., larvae of Anisakis pegreffii, characterized by molecular tools at the species level, and plerocercoids of Phyllobothrium sp., with prevalences of 30.5% and 2.3%, respectively. Highly significant seasonal variation in diet consumption, congruent with seasonal variation in anisakid intensity, was observed, underlining the tight role of squid prey in the trophic transmission of parasite. Likewise, the highest helminth prevalence and intensity of infection was recorded in autumn, when the fish prey, mostly Maurolicus muelleri, comprised the greatest proportion of diet. This helped to assign the Adriatic broadtail shortfin squid not as a first, but as a second, paratenic host for the anisakid, unlike as suggested previously. The presence of larval A. pegreffii confirms its previously reported zoogeographical distribution in the Mediterranean and Adriatic Seas. The presence of 2 helminths in I. coindetii describes the feeding patterns of the squid, as well as clearly defined and coevolved predator–prey relationships.

Predatory cephalopods, with their important role in marine food webs (Clarke, 1996) are significant intermediate/paratenic hosts in the transmission and life cycles of many parasites. Previous studies have showed their susceptibility to infection by a number of parasitic groups in the waters of all major oceans and seas (Pascual, Gestal et al., 1996; Gestal et al., 1999; González et al., 2003; Pascual et al., 2007). Many parasites, particularly those belonging to Digenea, Cestoda, and Nematoda, exploit trophic transmission of their infective stages ingested by an intermediate host, followed many times by a paratenic host in the life cycle.

Marine food webs have extremely long food chains, including also large invertebrate predators, such as chaetognaths, coelenterates, and decapods. Typically, they are more long-lived than copepods, isopods, and amphipods that may be used as first intermediate host, resulting in a necessity to develop transport or paratenic hosts as part of the parasites' life cycle. Paratenic hosts serve as a means for bridging trophic and temporal ecological gaps between intermediate and definite hosts, without engaging in parasite development into another life cycle stage (Abollo et al., 1998; Marcogliese, 2005). This permits the infective stage to persist in the environment for longer periods, increasing the chance of ingestion by the next host. Many marine parasites thus are transferred from 1 intermediate, or paratenic, host to another via predation.

Squids are especially common as paratenic hosts of helminth parasites, particularly to those that have elasmobranchs and mammals as final hosts (Hochberg, 1983). Anisakid nematode larvae and cestode plerocercoids are most frequently transferred through the trophic chain by oegopsid squids (Pascual, Gonzalez et al., 1996; Abollo et al., 1998). Although several studies on host–parasite systems with cephalopods as hosts have been completed recently (Abollo et al., 2001; Pascual et al., 2005; Mladineo and Bočina, 2007; Nigmatullin et al., 2009), our understanding of the interactions between diet, feeding behavior, parasitic disease, and transmission pathways in cephalopod–parasite systems is still incomplete.

All known exploited species of cephalopods harbor parasites—fast-growing, predatory ommastrephid squids, like Illex coindetii (Verany, 1839), are no exception (Pascual et al., 1994, 1995, 2005). This broadtail shortfin squid is an economically important species, widely distributed throughout the Mediterranean Sea, in the eastern Atlantic from the south of Britain to Namibia, and in the western Atlantic from the Caribbean, Gulf of Mexico, and to the Straits of Florida (Sánchez et al., 1998). It is a monocyclic species with a 1-yr life span (Laptikhovsky and Nigmatullin, 1993) that primarily feeds on fish, namely, small mesopelagic sternoptychids and myctophids (Lordan et al., 1998). In the Adriatic Sea, squids constitute a large portion of the total cephalopod catch, with annual landings of approximately 400 tons and short-finned squid, I. coindetii, represents a valuable demersal resource as 1 of the most important cephalopod species caught by trawlers (Ceriola et al., 2007).

However, despite its commercial significance and importance in the trophic ecology, nothing is known about the host–parasite relationships of this species in the Adriatic waters. Moreover, the only report of a cephalopod parasite in the Adriatic basin refers to Aggregata octopiana (Apixomplexa, Coccidia) infection in the reared Octopus vulgaris (Mladineo and Jozić, 2005; Mladineo and Bočina, 2007). Furthermore, there are a limited number of studies carried out on cephalopod–parasite systems in the Mediterranean waters as well (Gestal et al., 1999). Although it was reported that I. coindetii from the northwest Spain harbors several parasite species, namely, tetraphyllidean cestodes, copepod crustaceans, and an anisakid nematode (González et al., 2003), the only Anisakis spp. infestation was reported in the Tyrrhenian Sea (western Mediterranean) by Gestal et al. (1999).

Therefore, the present study was designed (1) to develop an inventory of parasitic helminths in the commercially important broadtail shortfin squid, I. coindetii; (2) to follow the population dynamics of these helminths; (3) to investigate the relationship between parasite infestation and host sex, maturity, and seasonality, with particular focus on the host feeding behavior; and (4) to identify isolated anisakid larvae at the species level with the use of molecular tools, in order to generate further insight into the parasites' zoogeography.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Sampling

In total, 439 short-finned squids, I. coindetii (245 males, 190 females, and 4 unsexed), were sampled in the central part of east Adriatic Sea, from October 2007 to October 2008. Specimens were collected at depths from 170 to 200 m with the use of a commercial bottom trawl with a 1.5-m vertical opening and 48-mm mesh size net, trawled at a speed of 2.7–2.9 knots for 4–5 hr between 43°38′ and 46°16′N and 15°19′ and 15°31′E. Collected squids were frozen on board, transported to the laboratory, and thawed prior to necropsy. The number of parasites per host and the site of infection in the host body (mantle cavity, digestive tract, gonads, and other reproductive organs) were recorded. Dorsal mantle length (DML) was measured to the nearest 1 mm and body weight (BW) was recorded to the nearest 0.1 g. For each squid, sex was determined and maturity stages (immature, maturing, and mature) were assigned after Jereb and Ragonese (1995).

Squid stomach contents were examined with the use of a dissecting microscope, and prey items were identified to the lowest taxonomic level possible. According to prey remains, 3 major categories were identified, i.e., fish, cephalopods, and crustaceans. Sagittal otoliths and cephalopod beaks were stored in 70% ethanol prior to identification to genus and, when possible, to the species level, with the use of Tuset et al. (2008) and Clarke (1986), respectively. Because crustacean remains were too digested for proper identification, they were only categorized as zooplankton or natant decapods. For each season, repletion ratio (number of stomachs with food/number of examined stomachs ∗ 100) and percentage frequency of occurrence for each prey group (number of stomachs containing prey type/number of stomachs containing prey) were calculated. Squids were grouped into 5 size categories, i.e., (1) <95 mm DML, (2) 95–115 mm DML, (3) 116–136 mm DML, (4) 137–157 mm DML, and (5) >157 mm DML.

Ecological terms describing parasitological dynamic: prevalence (P), mean intensity (I) and mean abundance (A) of infection were used according Margolis et al. (1982) and Bush et al. (1997). Sterne's exact 95% confidence limits were calculated for prevalences, bootstrap 95% confidence limits (number of bootstrap replications  =  2,000) for mean abundances, variance to mean ration (var/mean ratio) as a measure of overdispersion and exponent of the negative binomial (k) for the parasite skewness with the use of Quantitative Parasitology 3.0 software (Reiczigel and Rózsa, 2005). Because parasites typically exhibit an aggregated (right-skewed) distribution within a host population, the negative binomial model represents the observed data following the maximum-likelihood method (Bliss and Fisher, 1953).

Statistical analysis

For statistical analysis of differences of prevalence, mean abundance, and mean intensity between the sexes and maturity stages, Fisher's exact test and bootstrap t-tests were used according to Rózsa et al. (2000). Pearson's correlation coefficient r was applied to determine the degree of association between parasite abundance and host-related factors (dorsal mantle length, maturity, and dietary habits). A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Nonparametric multivariate techniques were used to compare dietary compositions among squid individuals. All multivariate analyses were preformed with the use of the PRIMER 5 statistical package. Triangular similarity matrices were calculated with the use of the Bray–Curtis similarity coefficient (Clarke and Warwick, 1994). The significance of differences in dietary composition between the sexes, maturity stages, size categories, and annual seasons was tested by analysis of similarities (ANOSIM).

Molecular identification of anisakid larvae

For phylogenetic analysis, genomic DNA was isolated with the use of the QIAGEN DNeasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, California) from 8 anisakid larvae isolated from the mantle cavity of the short-finned squids. A ∼645-bp fragment of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxydase 2 (CO2) locus was amplified with the use of 0.8 µM of each of the following specific primers: forward primer 5′ TCTGACTTCCAATCAGAGG 3′ and reverse primer 5′ GTCACTTCCAAAGCAATGG 3′. The rest of the reaction mix consisted of 2 mM of MgSO4, 220 µM of dNTP, 22 U/ml of PCR SuperMix High Fidelity DNA polymerase mixture (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, California) and 3 ng/µl of template. The amplification profile consisted of initial denaturation for 30 sec at 94 C, 35 cycles of denaturation for 30 sec each at 94 C, annealing at 52 C for 30 sec, elongation for 60 sec at 72 C, with final extension of 10 min at 72 C. PCR products were purified with the use of QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen) and sequenced on an ABI 3100 automatic DNA sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, California), with the use of the ABI PRISM BigDye Terminator Cycle Sequencing Kit, in both directions. Sequences were aligned with other anisakid sequences stored in GenBank (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/Genbank/GenbankSearch.html: Anisakis pegreffii DQ116428; Anisakis simplex AJ132189; A. simplex 1 DQ116426; A. simplex C DQ116429; Anisakis typica DQ116427, Anisakis ziphidarum DQ116430; A. simplex SM-2005 DQ116431; Pseudoterranova ceticola DQ116435; Anisakis paggiae DQ116434; Anisakis brevispiculata DQ116433; Anisakis physeteris DQ116432), by Clustal X, implemented in the MEGA 3.1 software, with default parameters. The same tool was used to perform neighbor-joining (NJ) analysis, based on p distance. Reliabilities of phylogenetic relationships were evaluated with the use of nonparametric bootstrap analysis (Felsenstein, 1985) with 2,000 replicates for NJ analysis. Bootstrap values exceeding 70 were considered well supported (Hills and Bull, 1993). Sequences were added to Genbank and the accession numbers of sequences obtained in this study are HM210153, HM210154, HM210155, HM210156, HM210157, HM210158, and HM210159.

RESULTS

The overall prevalences of nematode A. pegreffii and cestode Phyllobothrium sp. parasitizing I. coindetii (N  =  439) were 30.5% and 2.3%, respectively (Table I). Overall abundance of parasites was 0.7. Host size ranged from 42 to 216 mm DML (mean ± SE mean: 118.68 ± 1.25), with the smallest and largest infected squid measuring 79 and 216 mm DML, respectively. Larval stages of both parasites were mainly located in the hosts' digestive tract. Anisakid larvae were identified as third-stage larvae based on the presence of a boring tooth, an excretory pore placed below the tooth, and a short tail with a rounded tip (Grabda, 1976). Anisakis pegreffii larvae were found coiled and encysted on the external wall of stomach (43.61%) or on gonads and other reproductive organs (17.11%), and the rest of parasites were found inside the stomach (5.06%), on the digestive gland (0.72%), or free in the mantle cavity (1.69%) (Fig. 1). Plerocercoids of Phyllobothrium sp. were found in the host stomach. They were identified based on the morphology of bothridia according to Euzet (1994). Phyllobothrium sp. larvae have a scolex with 4 large bothridia with curled margins and a round anterior accessory sucker.

Figure 1. Occurrence (%) of nematode Anisakis pegreffii larvae in various body sites in Illex coindetii (S ext—external wall of stomach; S lum—stomach lumen; RO—gonads and reproductive organs; M—mantle cavity; DG—digestive gland).Figure 1. Occurrence (%) of nematode Anisakis pegreffii larvae in various body sites in Illex coindetii (S ext—external wall of stomach; S lum—stomach lumen; RO—gonads and reproductive organs; M—mantle cavity; DG—digestive gland).Figure 1. Occurrence (%) of nematode Anisakis pegreffii larvae in various body sites in Illex coindetii (S ext—external wall of stomach; S lum—stomach lumen; RO—gonads and reproductive organs; M—mantle cavity; DG—digestive gland).
Figure 1 Occurrence (%) of nematode Anisakis pegreffii larvae in various body sites in Illex coindetii (S ext—external wall of stomach; S lum—stomach lumen; RO—gonads and reproductive organs; M—mantle cavity; DG—digestive gland).

Citation: The Journal of Parasitology 97, 1; 10.1645/GE-2562.1

Table I Total mean prevalence (%) with Stern's exact 95% confidence limits (CI), mean intensity and mean abundances with bootstrap 95% CI, and variance-to-mean ratio of parasites Anisakis pegreffii and Phyllobothrium sp. isolated from Illex coindetii through the seasons. For each season, data on host length are given as mean dorsal mantle length (DML) ± standard error (SE). Exponent of the negative binomial (k) showed no statistical difference between observed and expected frequencies at P  =  0.05*.
Table I

Individuals of A. pegreffii were found to be highly aggregated across host populations, with most individuals harboring low numbers of parasites and only few with many of them (Fig. 2). The greatest number of parasites (N  =  12) were harbored in 2 mature females of 195 and 154 mm DML, and 1 mature male of 154 mm DML. Prevalence, mean intensity, and mean abundance for both sex and maturity stages are presented in Table II. Fisher's exact test showed no significant differences of A. pegreffii prevalences between males and females (P  =  0.755). Furthermore, the bootstrap t-test showed no significant differences between the sexes in mean intensity (t  =  1.167, P  =  0.2665) and in mean abundance (t  =  0.711, P  =  0.459). Prevalences of Phyllobothrium sp. infecting opposite sexes were significantly different (Fisher's exact test, P  =  0.048), with a higher proportion in male hosts (Table II). The bootstrap t-test showed significant difference in mean abundance between the sexes (t  =  −2.448, P  =  0.0355).

Figure 2. Observed parasite frequency distributions for host–parasite interactions: Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetii.Figure 2. Observed parasite frequency distributions for host–parasite interactions: Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetii.Figure 2. Observed parasite frequency distributions for host–parasite interactions: Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetii.
Figure 2 Observed parasite frequency distributions for host–parasite interactions: Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetii.

Citation: The Journal of Parasitology 97, 1; 10.1645/GE-2562.1

Table II Prevalence (P), mean intensity (I), and mean abundance (A) ± standard deviation (SD) (min-max) for Anisakis pegreffii and Phyllobothrium sp. infesting Illex coindetii females and males with maturity stages data pooled for sexes (1—immature; 2—maturing; 3—mature). Data on host length are given as mean dorsal mantle length (DML) ± standard error (SE).
Table II

A highly significant correlation was found between host length (DML) and abundance of A. pegreffii (Pearson's r  =  0.913, P  =  0.011), but not for Phyllobothrium spp. Although there was a positive relationship between host maturity and parasite abundances, it was not significant (for A. pegreffii, Pearson's r  =  0.975, P  =  0.141; for Phyllobothrium sp., Pearson's r  =  0.866, P  =  0.333). For A. pegreffii infection, a comparison of prevalences and mean abundances showed highly significant differences between all maturity stages (P < 0.05).

Seasonal oscillations of A. pegreffii prevalence and mean abundance are shown in Figure 3a; total values of prevalence, intensity, and abundance for each season are presented in Table I. Significant seasonal variation were detected in prevalences (Fisher's exact test: P < 0.05), mean abundances, and intensities of A. pegreffii (bootstrap t-test: P < 0.05). Anisakid infection occurred through all seasons, with lowest prevalence in summer (13.1%) and highest in autumn 2008 (55.0%) (Table I). A strong positive correlation between the mean intensity of infection and the degree of parasite aggregation (var/mean ratio) was observed (Pearson's r  =  0.987, P  =  0.002). Phyllobothrium sp. was absent in the winter of 2008, with lowest prevalence in spring 2008 (0.8%) and highest in autumn 2008 (8.3%) (Table I).

Figure 3. (a) Seasonal oscillations in prevalence (P) and mean abundance (A) of Anisakis pegreffii, (b) seasonal changes in prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and repletion ratio (R.R.) of Illex coindetii.Figure 3. (a) Seasonal oscillations in prevalence (P) and mean abundance (A) of Anisakis pegreffii, (b) seasonal changes in prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and repletion ratio (R.R.) of Illex coindetii.Figure 3. (a) Seasonal oscillations in prevalence (P) and mean abundance (A) of Anisakis pegreffii, (b) seasonal changes in prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and repletion ratio (R.R.) of Illex coindetii.
Figure 3 (a) Seasonal oscillations in prevalence (P) and mean abundance (A) of Anisakis pegreffii, (b) seasonal changes in prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and repletion ratio (R.R.) of Illex coindetii.

Citation: The Journal of Parasitology 97, 1; 10.1645/GE-2562.1

Analysis of stomach contents (N  =  429) showed that I. coindetii mainly preys on fish (61.4%), crustaceans (30.0%), and cephalopods (28.4%). A total of 126 stomachs had no prey remains (29.37%). The most frequent prey species were pearlsides (Maurolicus muelleri) (16.83%), and other less frequent teleosts included capelin (Trisopterus minutus), silvery pout (Gadiculus argenteus), greater forkbeard (Phycis blennoides), and horse mackarel (Trachurus trachurus) (Table III). Fish comprised the greatest proportion of diet in all seasons, except in summer, when cephalopods represented the primary prey group (Fig. 3b). Euphausiids were eaten more frequently in summer and spring, and were absent from other seasons. Repletion ratio was smallest in autumn 2007 (51.0%) and highest in summer (90.5%) (Fig. 3b). The relative proportion of the main prey categories changed with squid size, with cephalopod prey decreasing and fish prey increasing with squid increase in size (Fig. 4). Interestingly, in summer, the lowest prevalence and abundance of A. pegreffii was observed. Comparing seasonal occurrence of nematode and prey, prevalence of A. pegreffii correlated positively only for fish prey (Pearson's r  =  0.634, P  =  0.251). The analysis of similarities (ANOSIM) of diet composition by squid sex, maturity stages, and size (DML) showed no differences (R  =  −0.008, P  =  0.903; R  =  0.003, P  =  0.287 and R  =  0.008, P  =  0.22, respectively). However, significant seasonal differences in the diet were found (ANOSIM: R  =  0.067, P  =  0.001), i.e., pairwise comparisons between the summer of 2008 and all other seasons, and the autumn of 2008 and all other seasons.

Figure 4. Prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and prevalence (P) of Anisakis pegreffii in relation to Illex coindetii dorsal mantle length (DML).Figure 4. Prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and prevalence (P) of Anisakis pegreffii in relation to Illex coindetii dorsal mantle length (DML).Figure 4. Prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and prevalence (P) of Anisakis pegreffii in relation to Illex coindetii dorsal mantle length (DML).
Figure 4 Prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and prevalence (P) of Anisakis pegreffii in relation to Illex coindetii dorsal mantle length (DML).

Citation: The Journal of Parasitology 97, 1; 10.1645/GE-2562.1

Table III Percentage occurrence (% FO) of prey items recovered from stomach contents of Illex coindetii from the Adriatic Sea.
Table III

The partial CO2 mitochondrial sequence of the isolated anisakid revealed a 498-bp sequence. Multiple sequence alignment showed that this isolate belongs to A. pegreffii (bootstrapping 2,000 generations). No ambiguities were present in the 8 isolates. Genetic divergence based on p-distance values showed that overall average between anisakid was 0.121, whereas squid isolates diverged from 0.006 to 0.027. The nucleotide frequencies of A. pegreffii were 45.7% T, 11.2% C, 21.0% A, and 22.1% G. Isolates share 491 identical pairs, and 6 transitional and 1 transversional pairs, with a ratio of 6.8. Neighbor-joining analysis generated a consensus tree resulting from 2,000 bootstrap replicates, which clustered squid Anisakis isolates within the A. pegreffii clade (Fig. 5). Tree topology rooted by P. ceticola, confirmed nematode branching in 2 main sister clades, with the first including A. paggie, A. brevispiculata, and A. physeteris, and the second polyphyletic clade that includes A. ziphidarum, A. simplex clade, as well as with A. pegreffii. All squid isolates of the nematode formed a well-supported clade with A. pegreffii, most closely related to A. simplex branch.

Figure 5. Rooted consensus tree generated by neighbor-joining analysis resulting from 2,000 bootstrap replicates. Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetti is represented by 8 isolates (in frame) clustering with A. pegreffiii (DQ116428) sister group.Figure 5. Rooted consensus tree generated by neighbor-joining analysis resulting from 2,000 bootstrap replicates. Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetti is represented by 8 isolates (in frame) clustering with A. pegreffiii (DQ116428) sister group.Figure 5. Rooted consensus tree generated by neighbor-joining analysis resulting from 2,000 bootstrap replicates. Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetti is represented by 8 isolates (in frame) clustering with A. pegreffiii (DQ116428) sister group.
Figure 5 Rooted consensus tree generated by neighbor-joining analysis resulting from 2,000 bootstrap replicates. Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetti is represented by 8 isolates (in frame) clustering with A. pegreffiii (DQ116428) sister group.

Citation: The Journal of Parasitology 97, 1; 10.1645/GE-2562.1

DISCUSSION

Although Anisakis spp. and Phyllobothrium sp. have been already reported for I. coindetii inhabiting the northeastern Atlantic (Pascual et al., 1995; Pascual, Gonzalez et al., 1996; Abollo et al., 1998, 2001; González et al., 2003) and Mediterranean waters (Gestal et al., 1999), the present study is their first report in broadtail shortfin squid, I. coindetii, from the Adriatic Sea, thus characterizing the nematode larvae at the species level. Furthermore, the present study provides the first data regarding the feeding ecology of this species in the Adriatic basin. Both isolated species of the parasites have shown development at the larval stage, suggesting a paratenic nature of I. coindetii as a host species. No significant differences were found between host sex and prevalence and intensity of A. pegreffii; however, prevalences of Phyllobothrium sp. infection between sexes were significantly different. It is interesting to note the substantially higher proportion of infected males, with only a single infected female. Such observation is difficult to explain without further study in a larger host population, although it might be related to some ecological idiosyncrasy in the male population.

Observed prevalences of A. pegreffii in this study (30.5%) are somewhat higher when compared to those of Pascual et al. (1995) (10.6%), Pascual, Gonzalez et al. (1996), and Abollo et al. (1998, 2001) (11.0%) in the northeastern Atlantic. Moreover, it seems that the A. pegreffii infestation is considerably higher then that the 4.8% reported for western Mediterranean by Gestal et al. (1999). However, such a low prevalence could be due to the smaller sample size (N  =  42) and the majority of immature squid (88%) in the sample. With respect to Phyllobothrium sp., the observed prevalence (2.3%) is much lower than in the northeastern Atlantic waters where prevalences of 61.8% (Pascual et al., 1995) and 45.9% were reported (Pascual, Gonzalez et al., 1996). The lower number of the cestode's definitive hosts in Adriatic waters, or smaller availability of the first intermediate or paratenic hosts that the squid feeds upon, could attribute to the observation.

A marked difference between I. coindetii individuals in the number of parasites they harbor was observed. It is evident that A. pegreffii has a strongly aggregated distribution, which is rather common among parasites (Rohde, 1993). The anisakid infection correlated well with host size, showing increasing trend in prevalence, intensity, and abundance with host length and consequently with maturity. The smallest infected squid measured 79 mm DML, indicating that I. coindetii acquires the infection at an early age and accumulates the parasite with further growth, increasing its opportunities to acquire even greater number of anisakids. Pascual, Gonzalez et al. (1996) reported Anisakis sp. infestation in I. coindetii longer than 120 mm DML, with large mature animals harboring the greatest number of parasites (N  =  150). However, the highest number of A. pegreffii observed in the present study was only 12. This discrepancy could be due to our smaller mean squid size (118 mm DML) compared to Pascual, Gonzalez et al. (1996) (173 mm DML), because factors that directly affect parasitic infestation are host size, its life span, and dietary habits.

Broadly speaking, a helminth fauna depends on both host habitat and diet, and, therefore, clearly demonstrates the role of the host in the local food webs. Cestode plerocercoids and larval nematodes are passively transmitted through trophic interactions, and most trophically transmitted parasites are associated with a particular niche and host diet (see Marcogliese, 2005). The final hosts of tetraphyllidean cestodes are elasmobranchs, where plerocercoids are commonly found encysted in the subcutaneous blubber, usually in the abdominal area (Agustí et al., 2005), and adults occur in the spiral valves (Euzet, 1994). Anisakis spp. have a complex life cycle, passing through a number of hosts to completion in marine mammals, where they mature in the digestive tract (Grabda, 1976). Anisakid nematodes are known as extreme generalists, occurring in both pelagic and benthic hosts, which contributes to their widespread distribution (Marcogliese, 1996). Although previous studies suggested that I. coindetii acquires anisakids by ingesting infected prey, mainly euphausiids as anisakid intermediate hosts or small bony fishes as parasite paratenic hosts (Pascual, Gonzalez, et al., 1996; Abollo et al., 2001), no investigation linking this squid species feeding habits and parasite loads has been conducted. Recently, Nigmatullin et al. (2009) reported on diet composition and helminth infection of neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii in the southeastern Pacific, however, without assessing possible diet–parasite relationships. The diet of I. coindetii has been previously investigated in several regions, revealing its omnivorous, but primarily piscivorous, feeding behavior (Castro and Hernández-García, 1995; Rasero et al., 1996; Lordan et al., 1998). We observed the same feeding pattern; i.e., the most frequently consumed prey were fishes, namely, pearlside, followed by crustaceans and cephalopods. Overall, the diets of males and females were similar and there was no statistically significant variation in the dietary habits during squid ontogeny. However, fish and cephalopods did comprise larger part of smaller juvenile I. coindetii diet, whereas the larger specimens mostly preyed upon fish, suggesting a gradual shift from cephalopod to fish feeding with squid size increase. In most species, ontogenetic diet shifts are mainly associated with change in habitat use (Werner and Gilliam, 1984) or in size-prey selection, because of morphological changes of beaks (Castro and Hernández-García, 1995).

In the present study, we observed a highly significant seasonal variation in diet consumption, suggesting that the diet varied in response to seasonal changes in availability of prey communities. Congruent to this pattern, seasonal variation in anisakid intensity also occurred. Temporal variations in parasite intensities are rather common in highly seasonal aquatic systems and can be generated by variation in both host physiology, e.g., immune function, or host exposure to parasite infective stages that may be driven by host-related factors, such as diet (see Wilson et al., 2002). Accordingly, we found that the seasonal variations in anisakid intensity are most likely affected by dietary habits of I. coindetii. Because in each season squid of all sizes and maturity stages were sampled, the notion that observed differences in prevalence are related to specific host factors can be rejected. The highest prevalence was seen in autumn, when the fish prey, mostly M. muelleri, comprised the greatest proportion of diet, and the lowest prevalence was in summer, corresponding with the majority of cephalopods in the diet. This helped to assign the Adriatic broadtail shortfin squid not as a first, but as a second, paratenic host for the anisakid, unlike what was suggested earlier (Mattiucci et al., 2001). This is further reinforced by the observation that squids that had euphausiids in stomach contents that are not infected by anisakid or cestodian larvae.

Anisakis pegreffii also represents the first molecular characterization of the nematode at the species level in the Adriatic Sea squid. Its occurrence in the Adriatic is not surprising, since this is the most frequent anisakid species in the Mediterranean and its adjacent seas (100% prevalence in a sample of 116 Adriatic fish) (Mattiucci et al., 2008). Interestingly, Mattiucci et al. (2001) suggested that rather than Mediterranean fish, squids are the main intermediate hosts of A. physeteris—an anisakid rarely found in the Mediterranean, but abundant in the north Atlantic horse mackerel T. trachurus. However, those authors did not confirm their observation using molecular tools, and our study evidenced that short-finned squid has been the paratenic host of A. pegreffii and not A. physeteris. To our knowledge, this is the first molecular identification of an anisakid from the Adriatic squids, adding to the nematode's ubiquitous and trophic-associated character.

In conclusion, trophic relationships vary over time and space, and animals with size and age-related diet change often alter the parasites they harbor, indicating ontogenic shifts in the feeding behavior (Marcogliese, 2005). Evidence from the helminth community of the Adriatic I. coindetii population favor ontogenic shifts in its feeding behavior due to morphological change of beaks and not because of habitat change. Furthermore, the consistent presence of only 2 helminth taxa indicates decisive feeding patterns, coevolved predator–prey relationships, and stability in an ecosystem (Marcogliese, 2005). Because parasites are recognized as an important part of food-web structure, contributing in food-web networking and nestedness (Lafferty et al., 2006), we believe that further investigations of their cephalopod community as parasite hosts will not only contribute to the knowledge of food-web structure, but will elucidate other biotic relationships of squids in the Adriatic Sea as well.

LITERATURE CITED

  • Abollo, E.
    ,
    C.Gestal
    ,
    A.López
    ,
    A. F.González
    ,
    A.Guerra
    , and
    S.Pascual
    . 1998. Squid as trophic bridges for parasite flow within marine ecosystems: The case of Anisakis simplex (Nematoda: Anisakidae), or when the wrong way can be right.InCephalopod biodiversity, ecology and evolution
    Payne, A. I. L.
    ,
    M. R.Lipiński
    ,
    M. R.Clarke
    , and
    M. A. C.Roeleveld
    . (eds.). South African Journal of Marine Science20:223232.
  • Abollo, E.
    ,
    C.Gestal
    , and
    S.Pascual
    . 2001. Anisakis infestation in marine fish and cephalopods from Galician waters: An updated perspective.Parasitology Research87:492499.
  • Agustí, C.
    ,
    F. J.Aznar
    ,
    P. D.Olson
    ,
    D. T. J.Littlewood
    ,
    A.Kostadinova
    , and
    J. A.Raga
    . 2005. Morphological and molecular characterization of tetraphyllidean merocercoids (Platyhelminthes: Cestoda) of striped dolphins (Stenella coeruleoalba) from the western Mediterranean.Parasitology130:461474.
  • Bliss, C. I.
    and
    R. A.Fisher
    . 1953. Fitting negative binomial distribution to biological data.Biometrics9:176200.
  • Bush, A. O.
    ,
    K. D.Lafferty
    ,
    J. M.Lotz
    , and
    A. W.Shostak
    . 1997. Parasitology meets ecology on its own terms: Margolis et al. revisited.Journal of Parasitology83:575583.
  • Castro, J.
    and
    V.Hernández-García
    . 1995. Ontogenetic changes in mouth structures, foraging behaviour and habitat use of Scomber japonicus and Illex coindetii.Scientia Marina59:347355.
  • Ceriola, L.
    ,
    N.Ungaro
    , and
    F.Toteda
    . 2007. A “traffic” light approach for the assessment of the broadtail shortfin squid Illex coindetii Verany, 1839 in the southern Adriatic Sea (Central Mediterranean).Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries17:145157.
  • Clarke, K. R.
    and
    M.Warwick
    . 1994. Change in marine communities.
    Plymouth Marine Laboratory
    .
    Plymouth, U.K
    . 144p.
  • Clarke, M. R.
    1986. A handbook for the identification of cephalopod beaks.
    Clarendon Press
    .
    Oxford, U.K
    . 273p.
  • Clarke, M. R.
    1996. Role of cephalopods in the world's oceans.Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B Biological Sciences351:9771112.
  • Euzet, L.
    1994. Order Tetraphyllidea Carus, 1863.InKeys to the cestode parasites of vertebrates.
    Khalil, L. F.
    ,
    A.Jones
    , and
    R. A.Bray
    . (eds.).
    CAB International
    .
    Wallingford, U.K
    . p.149194.
  • Felsenstein, J.
    1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap.Evolution39:783791.
  • Gestal, C.
    ,
    P.Belcari
    ,
    E.Abollo
    , and
    S.Pascual
    . 1999. Parasites of cephalopods in the northern Tyrrhenian Sea (western Mediterranean): New host records and host specificity.Scientia Marina63:3943.
  • González, A. F.
    ,
    S.Pascual
    ,
    C.Gestal
    ,
    E.Abollo
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 2003. What makes a cephalopod a suitable host for parasite? The case of Galician waters.Fisheries Research60:177183.
  • Grabda, J.
    1976. Studies on the life cycle and morphogenesis of Anisakis simplex (Rudolphi, 1809) (Nematoda. Anisakidae) cultured in vitro.Acta Ichthyologica et Piscatoria6:119139.
  • Hills, D. M.
    and
    J. J.Bull
    . 1993. An empirical test of bootstrapping as a method for assessing confidence in phylogenetic analysis.Systematic Biology42:182192.
  • Hochberg, F. G.
    1983. The parasites of cephalopods: A review.Memoirs of the National Museum of Victoria44:109145.
  • Jereb, P.
    and
    S.Ragonese
    . 1995. An outline of the biology of the squid Illex coindetii in the Sicilian Channel (Central Mediterranean).Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom75:373390.
  • Lafferty, K. D.
    ,
    A. P.Dobson
    , and
    A. M.Kuris
    . 2006. Parasites dominate food web links.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA103:1121111216.
  • Laptikhovsky, V. V.
    and
    C. M.Nigmatullin
    . 1993. Egg size, fecundity and spawning in females of the genus Illex (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae).ICES Journal of Marine Science50:393403.
  • Lordan, C.
    ,
    G. M.Burnell
    , and
    T. F.Cross
    . 1998. The diet and ecological importance of Illex coindetii and Todaropsis eblanae (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in Irish waters.InCephalopod biodiversity, ecology and evolution
    Payne, A. I. L.
    ,
    M. R.Lipiński
    ,
    M. R.Clarke
    , and
    M. A. C.Roeleveld
    . (eds.). South African Journal of Marine Science20:153163.
  • Marcogliese, D. J.
    1996. Larval parasitic nematodes infecting marine crustaceans in eastern Canada. 3. Hysterothylacium adundum.Journal of the Helminthological Society of Washington63:1218.
  • Marcogliese, D. J.
    2005. Transmission of marine parasites. Chapter 7. Ecology.InMarine parasitology.
    Rohde, K.
    (ed.).
    CABI Publishing
    .
    Collingwood, Australia
    . p.279286.
  • Margolis, L.
    ,
    G. W.Esch
    ,
    J. C.Holmes
    ,
    A. M.Kuris
    , and
    G. A.Schad
    . 1982. The use of ecological terms in parasitology (report of an ad hoc committee of the American Society of Parasitologists).Journal of Parasitology68:131133.
  • Mattiucci, S.
    ,
    V.Farina
    ,
    N.Campbell
    ,
    K.Mackenzie
    ,
    P.Ramos
    ,
    A. L.Pinto
    ,
    P.Abaunza
    , and
    G.Nascetti
    . 2008. Anisakis spp. larvae (Nematoda: Anisakidae) from Atlantic horse mackerel: Their genetic identification and use as biological tags for host stock characterization.Fisheries Research89:146151.
  • Mattiucci, S.
    ,
    L.Paggi
    ,
    G.Nascetti
    ,
    E.Abollo
    ,
    S. C.Webb
    ,
    S.Pascual
    ,
    R.Cianchi
    , and
    L.Bullini
    . 2001. Genetic divergence and reproductive isolation between Anisakis brevispiculata and Anisakis physeteris (Nematoda: Anisakidae).International Journal for Parasitology31:914.
  • Mladineo, I.
    and
    I.Bočina
    . 2007. Extraintestinal gamogony of Aggregata octopiana in the reared common octopus (Octopus vulgaris) (Cephalopoda: Octopodidae).Journal of Invertebrate Pathology96:261264.
  • Mladineo, I.
    and
    M.Jozić
    . 2005. Aggregata infection in the common octopus, Octopus vulgaris (Linnaeus, 1758), Cephalopoda: Octopodidae, reared in a flow-through system.Acta Adriatica46:193199.
  • Nigmatullin, C. M.
    ,
    A. S.Shchetinnikov
    , and
    O. A.Shukhgalter
    . 2009. On feeding and helminth fauna of neon flying squid Ommastrephes bartramii (Lesueur, 1821) (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in the southeastern Pacific.Revista de Biología Marina y Oceanografia44:227235.
  • Pascual, S.
    ,
    C.Gestal
    ,
    J.Estévez
    ,
    H.Rodríguez
    ,
    M.Soto
    ,
    E.Abollo
    , and
    C.Arias
    . 1996. Parasites in commercially-exploited cephalopods (Mollusca, Cephalopoda) in Spain: An updated perspective.Aquaculture142:110.
  • Pascual, S.
    ,
    A.González
    ,
    C.Arias
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 1995. Helminth infection in the short-finned squid Illex coindetii (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) off NW Spain.Disease of Aquatic Organisms23:7175.
  • Pascual, S.
    ,
    A.González
    ,
    C.Arias
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 1996. Biotic relationships of Illex coindetii and Todaropsis eblanae (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) in the northeast Atlantic: Evidence from parasites.Sarsia81:265274.
  • Pascual, S.
    ,
    A.González
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 2005. The recruitment of gill-infesting copepods as a categorical predictor of size-at-age data in squid populations.ICES Journal of Marine Science62:629633.
  • Pascual, S.
    ,
    A.González
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 2007. Parasite recruitment and oceanographic regime: Evidence suggesting a relationship on a global scale.Biological Review82:257263.
  • Pascual, S.
    ,
    B.Lores
    ,
    C.Arias
    ,
    A.González
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 1994. Helminth parasites of Illex coindetii (Cephalopoda, Ommastrephidae) off the Galician coast (NE Atlantic).Scientia Marina58:269272.
  • Rasero, M.
    ,
    A. F.González
    ,
    B. G.Castro
    , and
    A.Guerra
    . 1996. Predatory relationships of two sympatric squid, Todaropsis eblanae and Illex coindetii (Cephalopoda: Ommastrephidae) in Galician waters.Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom76:7387.
  • Reiczigel, J.
    and
    L.Rózsa
    . 2005. Quantitative parasitology 3.0. Budapest.Distributed by the authors.
  • Rohde, K.
    1993. Ecology of marine parasites.
    CAB International
    .
    Wallingford, U.K
    . 298p.
  • Sánchez, P.
    ,
    F.González
    ,
    P.Jereb
    ,
    V. V.Laptikhovsky
    ,
    K.Mangold
    ,
    C.Nigmatullin
    , and
    S.Ragonese
    . 1998. Illex coindetii.InSquid recruitment dynamics: The commercial Illex species.
    Rodhouse, P. G.
    ,
    E. G.Dawe
    , and
    R. K.O'Dor
    . (eds.).
    FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 376, FAO
    .
    Rome, Italy
    . p.5976.
  • Rózsa, L.
    ,
    J.Reiczigel
    , and
    G.Majoros
    . 2000. Quantifying parasites in samples of hosts.Journal of Parasitology86:228232.
  • Tuset, V. M.
    ,
    A.Lombarte
    , and
    C. A.Assis
    . 2008. Otolith atlas for the western Mediterranean, north and central eastern Atlantic.Scientia Marina72S1:7198.
  • Werner, E. E.
    and
    J. F.Gilliam
    . 1984. The ontogenetic niche and species interactions in size-structured populations.Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics15:393425.
  • Wilson, K.
    ,
    O. N.Bjørnstad
    ,
    A. P.Dobson
    ,
    S.Merler
    ,
    G.Poglayen
    ,
    S. E.Randolph
    ,
    A. F.Read
    , and
    A.Skorping
    . 2002. Heterogeneities in macroparasite infections: Patterns and processes.InThe ecology of wildlife diseases.
    Hudson, P. J.
    ,
    A.Rizzoli
    ,
    B. T.Grenfell
    ,
    H.Heesterbeek
    , and
    A. P.Dobson
    . (eds.).
    Oxford University Press
    .
    Oxford, U.K
    . p.644.
Copyright: American Society of Parasitologists 2011
F
<sc>igure</sc>
1
F igure 1

Occurrence (%) of nematode Anisakis pegreffii larvae in various body sites in Illex coindetii (S ext—external wall of stomach; S lum—stomach lumen; RO—gonads and reproductive organs; M—mantle cavity; DG—digestive gland).


F
<sc>igure</sc>
2
F igure 2

Observed parasite frequency distributions for host–parasite interactions: Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetii.


F
<sc>igure</sc>
3
F igure 3

(a) Seasonal oscillations in prevalence (P) and mean abundance (A) of Anisakis pegreffii, (b) seasonal changes in prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and repletion ratio (R.R.) of Illex coindetii.


F
<sc>igure</sc>
4
F igure 4

Prey composition (% FO—percentage occurrence) and prevalence (P) of Anisakis pegreffii in relation to Illex coindetii dorsal mantle length (DML).


F
<sc>igure</sc>
5
F igure 5

Rooted consensus tree generated by neighbor-joining analysis resulting from 2,000 bootstrap replicates. Anisakis pegreffii isolated from Illex coindetti is represented by 8 isolates (in frame) clustering with A. pegreffiii (DQ116428) sister group.


Contributor Notes

Institute of Oceanography and Fisheries, P.O. Box 500, 21 000 Split, Croatia.

Received: 10 Jun 2010
Accepted: 21 Sept 2010
  • Download PDF